SaaS Dashboard · Product Design

relocateMe

A unified relocation management platform that replaced 12 spreadsheets with one calm, guided dashboard — improving compliance from 61% to 94%.

  • Year: 2023
  • Duration: 14 weeks
  • Team: 2 UX designers + 3 developers + PM
  • Role: UX Researcher & Product Designer
94%
Compliance Rate (was 61%)
3 wks
Faster Relocations
78
SUS Score (was 42)
-60%
HR Coordination Time

Overview

relocateMe is a B2B SaaS platform for corporate relocation. HR managers use it to coordinate employee moves across cities and countries — a process involving dozens of documents, deadlines, vendors, and stakeholders. The legacy product was failing both sides of the equation.

The problem

HR managers juggled 12+ spreadsheets with no single source of truth. Employees in transit had no visibility into their own relocation progress. Compliance deadlines were frequently missed, creating legal exposure for the companies involved.

The goal

Design a unified, role-based dashboard that gives HR managers full visibility and control, while giving relocating employees a calm, step-by-step experience — eliminating the spreadsheet dependency entirely.

Hypothesis

A milestone-based progress system with role-specific views and automated compliance alerts will reduce coordination errors and improve both HR efficiency and employee satisfaction during the relocation process.

Research

Participants: 6 HR managers + 8 relocating employees across 3 companies

Methods

  • Contextual inquiry (observed real relocations)
  • Stakeholder interviews (6 HR managers)
  • Employee interviews (8 people in active relocation)
  • Card sorting (IA restructuring)
  • Journey mapping (47 touchpoints identified)

Key findings

  1. 01

    HR managers spent avg. 3.5 hours/week just tracking document status across spreadsheets

  2. 02

    Employees described the process as "stressful," "opaque," and "like shouting into a void"

  3. 03

    Compliance documents were submitted late 39% of the time, causing legal delays

  4. 04

    Neither party had real-time visibility — everything was email-based

  5. 05

    The existing tool had 47 navigation items — users only used 8 regularly

What the research told me

1

Two worlds, one product

HR and employees had completely different mental models of relocation. One product needed two distinct views.

2

Checklist over calendar

Users thought in tasks and milestones, not dates. A timeline was less useful than a progress tracker.

3

Alert fatigue is real

The legacy tool sent 15+ email notifications per week per user. Users ignored all of them.

4

Navigation overload

47 nav items for an 8-item use case. Radical simplification was needed.

Design

Iteration

v1

Unified view for both roles

User insight

"HR managers felt overwhelmed by employee-level detail. Employees felt exposed seeing HR-only compliance data."

Design change

Built role-based routing. Same login, completely different dashboard experience per role.

v2

Calendar-based progress view

User insight

"Users didn't connect with dates — they thought in milestones. "Am I on Step 3 or Step 5?""

Design change

Replaced calendar with a 5-phase milestone tracker (Initiated → In Transit → Settled → Closed). Instantly clearer.

v3

Milestone tracker + smart alerts

User insight

"Users praised the clarity. HR loved the "overdue" highlight. Employees understood their next step."

Design change

Added proactive deadline alerts (3 levels: upcoming, due today, overdue). Shipped.

Design system

Colour palette

  • Navy
  • Steel blue
  • Compliance green
  • Alert amber
  • Overdue red

Typography

Inter throughout — optimized for data-dense dashboard readability at all sizes

Key components

  • Milestone Progress Tracker
  • Document Checklist Card
  • Status Badge (3 states)
  • Alert Banner (3 severity levels)
  • Role-Based Sidebar Nav

Outcome

Compliance document submission improved from 61% to 94%. Average relocation completed 3 weeks faster. SUS score jumped from 42 to 78. HR managers reduced coordination time by 60%. Product became the vendor's primary selling point in sales demos.

What I learned

  1. 01

    Designing for two user types in one product requires clear role-based mental models — not just different screens, but different information architectures.

  2. 02

    Progress indicators outperform calendars when users think in milestones, not dates.

  3. 03

    Radical IA simplification (47 → 8 nav items) doesn't lose features — it surfaces what actually matters.

Next case study

Mini Pancake Co.

E-Commerce + Booking · React Rebuild